|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Striker
quality . . . quality . . . and more quality! |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Striker
STC-88 (88 lbs.) one-piece versus the Anyang "Z" 88 (88 lbs.) one-piece: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Striker
STC-88 one-piece forging hammer |
|
|
|
|
|
Anyang
"Z" 88 one-piece forging hammer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
List
Price - $7,495.00
Weight - 2,593 lbs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
List
Price - $5,950.00
Weight - 1,940 lbs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When
compared on a pound-for-pound basis, the Striker forging hammer is 6% cheaper
than the Anyang! The Striker forging hammer isn't more expensive . . . It offers
more Quality, Power and Value! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
The
Striker STC-88 net weight is 2,593 lbs.
The
Anyang "Z" 88 net weight is 1,940 lbs.
The
Striker STC-88 is 653 lbs. (34%) heavier!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fact
- The Striker STC-88 one-piece hammer is 34% (653 lbs.) heavier
than the Anyang "Z" 88 hammer!
Fact
- The Striker STC-88
one-piece weighs 2,593 lbs. versus the Anyang's 1,940 lbs.!
Fact
- The more weight you have below your die . . . the higher the anvil-to-ram
ratio!
Fact
- The higher your anvil-to-ram ratio
. . . more of your striking energy goes into your work piece - not into the
hammer!
Fact
-
The cast frame is the skeleton of your forging hammer. Without a strong, well
designed skeleton, you have a higher probability of stress cracks and frame
failure! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Striker
STC-88 (88 lbs.) one-piece forging hammers!
|
|
|
|
|
| Due
to the success of the Striker one-piece hammers, secondary factories are now
copying us and are casting one-piece hammers. Which would you rather buy? An
experimental one-piece hammer with limited field testing or a proven one-piece
work horse that has been bought by the likes of The U.S Navy, Nucor Steel and
EPCOR Utilities? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |